FireNerd
06-19-2004, 11:56 AM
Yeah I know occasionally they happen despite the best intentions and efforts. However, anyone else have an experience similar to this: Lightning strikes 2.5 story SFD, causes small fire in basement. Initial fire is basically held by sprinkler system in basement. First in crews ordered by chief to check for extension with TIC. Crews locate heat on exterior side B of structure, request permission to remove siding to check for extension. Chief denies permission, orders crews to take up and return. Five hours later, companies are redispatched to the same residence. Chief arrives on scene to report heavy fire side B of residence. This time, the attic and half of the second floor become total losses.
During the post-incident critique, the Chief (who also, conveniently enough, happens to be the township fire marshal) states that the rekindle was caused by a "quarter sized" area of heat that went undetected (despite crews finding heat underneath the siding where, lo and behold, the rekindle started). Further, he claims that the homeowner would have been more upset had crews pulled the siding and found nothing, than with the actual results.
Anyone else have similar experiences with incompetence causing unecessary loss? Anyone have any suggestions for how to deal with idiots like this?
During the post-incident critique, the Chief (who also, conveniently enough, happens to be the township fire marshal) states that the rekindle was caused by a "quarter sized" area of heat that went undetected (despite crews finding heat underneath the siding where, lo and behold, the rekindle started). Further, he claims that the homeowner would have been more upset had crews pulled the siding and found nothing, than with the actual results.
Anyone else have similar experiences with incompetence causing unecessary loss? Anyone have any suggestions for how to deal with idiots like this?